Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Will New Oil Fields Avert the Peak Oil Crisis?






By Keith Kohl | Tuesday,
January 22nd, 2008

A few of you wrote to me last week asking what my thoughts were concerning world oil production. Specifically, the majority of you wanted to know whether I felt new oil field production will be enough to save global production. (On a side note, some of your comments were a bit more colorful than others.)
Regardless of how the question is phrased, do I feel new production is going to save us?
The simple answer is: Not a chance in hell.
But, as usual, your questions got me obsessed. I couldn't think of anything else the entire weekend. It wasn't enough for me to simply look at the new fields coming o­nline. After all, we've had a number of positive discoveries lately. In 2007, China discovered a nice offshore oil field that could hold up to could hold up to 2.2 billion barrels in reserves. Also remember the discovery of the Tupi field off the shores of Brazil, which is estimated to have between five and eight billion barrels of oil.
With news like this coming out, how can I be so critical?
Well, there are actually several reasons for my skepticism . . .
New Oil Fields to the Rescue?
To answer your questions, let's first take a look at the decline rate. CERA (Cambridge Energy Research Associates) reports that production from the world's oil fields is declining at an annual rate of 4.5%.
If world production is around 85 million barrels per day, that comes out to just under four million barrels per day we'll need to make up to offset decline. Remember, that number is coming from a survey of approximately 800 oil fields and is more than half of the 8% decline other analysts are predicting.
Let's also forget for a minute that the largest producers like Saudi Arabia refuse to disclose their field data.
Even CERA's low prediction of 4.5% is still a significant amount of new oil the world will need to make up. That's like finding a new Iran every year.
What if the decline rate is up to 8%? That would mean we'll need to find the equivalent of o­ne new Saudi Arabia each year!
Stop for a second and take a look at some of the world's producers. Saudi Arabia is in serious trouble. The fact is that 65% of their oil production from 1948 to 2000 has come from the massive Ghawar field, which comes out to roughly 65 billion barrels. Now that Ghawar is in decline, the Saudis are going to be hard pressed to make up the difference.
Advertisement
Renegade Options Trader, Ian Cooper, uses the Same Science Behind Google’s Success to Pick Stocks
Six years ago, his track record mysteriously started to take off. 302% gains, then 515% and 552.17%. As a result, his picks have been splashed everywhere, from the pages of Forbes and Investor's Business Daily to television spots up and down the dial.
Rumor has it that his unstoppable track record is aided by a little-known ability to manipulate Google's o­ne-of-a-kind algorithm and he is about to share his "secret" with a small group of investors that could make an absolute fortune.
Click here to find out more.
--
At least they had a good run.
Perhaps Ghawar is o­n its way to being the next Cantarell. As you know, the giant Mexican field is in a major decline, falling more than 20% per year. The U.S. is well aware of how serious this is. Oil imports from Mexico have dropped around 11% in 2007.
I can't blame the Saudis for hiding their field data.
If we found out how bad it really is over there, do you honestly think the U.S. wouldn't start looking elsewhere? We actually have begun easing our dependence o­n Saudi oil, but I'll save that for next week.
Cantarell and Ghawar are just two examples, and out of the world's ten largest oil fields, o­nly o­ne is expected to raise production.
Why am I so worried about the giant fields?
It's because we're no longer finding them.
The major offshore discoveries last year in Brazil and China together boast more than 10 billion barrels of reserves. But let me ask you this: "What do 10 billion barrels of reserves mean to us right now?"
Absolutely nothing.
Reserves mean next to nothing if you don't have the means to produce them.
These offshore fields, the best discoveries of 2007, are going to take a tremendous amount of investment dollars as well as years of development to bring into production. The Tupi field off Brazil's coast could cost up to $100 billion dollars to develop.
The truth is that we're drilling farther and deeper than ever before, and all for lesser quality oil. Over the next five years, people are going to get a very real understanding of how peak oil will affect our world because the impending energy crisis is coming and coming quickly. To read more o­n peak oil and how it will impact you, click here now.
Until next time,
Keith Kohl
www.energyandcapital.net

Comment o­n / Rate this Article
Subscribe to
our RSS Feed
What is an RSS Feed?

Current Energy Prices
Crude Oil $87.42 -2.50
Gasoline RBOB $2.24 -0.06
Natural Gas $7.83 -0.17
Heating Oil $2.43 -0.07
Propane $1.46 0.00

Categories
Fossil Fuels
Renewables
World of Energy
Investing in Energy

Advertisement
PROFIT FROM THE PEAK
According to Wealth Daily's Brian Hicks, we are facing the end of our oil-based economy. Not just the United States, but the world.
But the coming oil crisis doesn't have to have entirely negative implications. Profit from the Peak shows readers the upside to the end of oil and how this event can actually be a positive for investors.
In a recent report published by the International Energy Agency (IEA), the world needs to spend $20 trillion to meeting surging, global energy demand. Brian believes that this capital investment represents o­ne of the greatest investment opportunities the world has ever witnessed.
Profit from the Peak is a roadmap that shows investors which companies and industries are best positioned to take advantage of the changing energy landscape.
Click Here to Learn More

--

Related Articles
Oil Sands Production
Investing in the Oil Crunch
Peaking Oil Production
Peak Oil Investing


--

From the Archives...
Election-Year Stocks
2008-01-21 - Nick Hodge
Solar's Downslide Presents an Upside
2008-01-18 - Nick Hodge
Questioning the End of Cheap Oil
2008-01-17 - Keith Kohl
China Market Slumps as Oil Weighs
2008-01-16 - Sam Hopkins
Our Emerging Oil Crisis
2008-01-15 - Keith Kohl

--
You can manage your subscription and get our privacy policy here.
Energy and Capital, Copyright © 2007, Angel Publishing LLC, P.O. Box 84905, Phoenix, AZ 85071. All rights reserved. No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned. While we believe the sources of information to be reliable, we in no way represent or guarantee the accuracy of the statements made herein. Energy and Capital does not provide individual investment counseling, act as an investment advisor, or individually advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. The publisher, editors and consultants of Angel Publishing may actively trade in the investments discussed in this newsletter. They may have substantial positions in the securities recommended and may increase or decrease such positions without notice. Neither the publisher nor the editors are registered investment advisors. Subscribers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal or investment counseling. Investments recommended in this publication should be made o­nly after consulting with your investment advisor and o­nly after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by Xerography, facsimile, or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.
Please note: It is not our intention to send email to anyone who doesn't want it. If you're not sure why you're getting this e-letter, or no longer wish to receive it, get more info here, including our privacy policy and information o­n how to manage your subscription.
Copyright © 2007 Energy and Capital,
Angel Publishing, LLC

Sent by:

Mohammed Ahmed Ali
Surrey, England, UK

No comments: